My Learning Cart
?
Categories
Account

Statement: No fish can fly. Argument: Therefore, some flying creatures are not f

₹0.0
Login to Download
  • 📥 Instant PDF Download
  • ♾ Lifetime Access
  • 🛡 Secure & Original Content

What’s inside this PDF?

Question: Statement: No fish can fly. Argument: Therefore, some flying creatures are not fish.

Options:

  1. The argument is valid.
  2. The argument is invalid.
  3. The statement is false.
  4. The statement is true.

Correct Answer: The argument is valid.

Solution: 

The argument is valid because if no fish can fly, it implies that some flying creatures are not fish.

Statement: No fish can fly. Argument: Therefore, some flying creatures are not f

Practice Questions

Q1
Statement: No fish can fly. Argument: Therefore, some flying creatures are not fish.
  1. The argument is valid.
  2. The argument is invalid.
  3. The statement is false.
  4. The statement is true.

Questions & Step-by-Step Solutions

Statement: No fish can fly. Argument: Therefore, some flying creatures are not fish.
  • Logical Implication – The relationship between premises and conclusions in deductive reasoning.
  • Negation – Understanding the implications of a statement being negated, such as 'no fish can fly' leading to conclusions about flying creatures.
Soulshift Feedback ×

On a scale of 0–10, how likely are you to recommend The Soulshift Academy?

Not likely Very likely
Home Practice Performance eBooks