My Learning Cart
?
Categories
Account

In which case did the Supreme Court hold that the Parliament cannot alter the ba

₹0.0
Login to Download
  • 📥 Instant PDF Download
  • ♾ Lifetime Access
  • 🛡 Secure & Original Content

What’s inside this PDF?

Question: In which case did the Supreme Court hold that the Parliament cannot alter the basic structure of the Constitution?

Options:

  1. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
  2. Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain
  3. Minerva Mills v. Union of India
  4. Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India

Correct Answer: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala

Solution: 

In Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, the Supreme Court held that the Parliament cannot alter the basic structure of the Constitution, establishing a crucial precedent for judicial review.

In which case did the Supreme Court hold that the Parliament cannot alter the ba

Practice Questions

Q1
In which case did the Supreme Court hold that the Parliament cannot alter the basic structure of the Constitution?
  1. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
  2. Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain
  3. Minerva Mills v. Union of India
  4. Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India

Questions & Step-by-Step Solutions

In which case did the Supreme Court hold that the Parliament cannot alter the basic structure of the Constitution?
  • Basic Structure Doctrine – The principle that certain fundamental features of the Constitution cannot be altered or destroyed by amendments.
  • Judicial Review – The power of the judiciary to review and invalidate legislative and executive actions that are inconsistent with the Constitution.
Soulshift Feedback ×

On a scale of 0–10, how likely are you to recommend The Soulshift Academy?

Not likely Very likely
Home Practice Performance eBooks