In which landmark judgment did the Supreme Court emphasize the harmony between F

₹0.0

Question: In which landmark judgment did the Supreme Court emphasize the harmony between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles?

Options:

Correct Answer: Minerva Mills v. Union of India

Solution:

In Minerva Mills v. Union of India, the Supreme Court emphasized the harmony between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles.

In which landmark judgment did the Supreme Court emphasize the harmony between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles?

In which landmark judgment did the Supreme Court emphasize the harmony between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles?

Step 1: Understand what Fundamental Rights are. They are basic human rights guaranteed by the Constitution.
Step 2: Understand what Directive Principles are. They are guidelines for the state to ensure social and economic justice.
Step 3: Know that the Supreme Court is the highest court in India and interprets the Constitution.
Step 4: Learn about the case Minerva Mills v. Union of India. It is a significant legal case in India.
Step 5: In this case, the Supreme Court stated that Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles should work together, not against each other.
Step 6: This means that both sets of rights are important for the country's governance and should be balanced.

Fundamental Rights – Basic human rights guaranteed by the Constitution that protect individual freedoms.
Directive Principles – Guidelines for the state to ensure social and economic justice, aimed at achieving a just society.
Judicial Interpretation – The role of the judiciary in interpreting the Constitution and balancing different provisions.