My Learning Cart
?
Categories
Account

No fish are mammals. Some mammals are not cats. Therefore, no fish are cats. Is

₹0.0
Login to Download
  • 📥 Instant PDF Download
  • ♾ Lifetime Access
  • 🛡 Secure & Original Content

What’s inside this PDF?

Question: No fish are mammals. Some mammals are not cats. Therefore, no fish are cats. Is this conclusion valid?

Options:

  1. Yes
  2. No
  3. Cannot be determined
  4. Only if more information is provided

Correct Answer: Yes

Solution: 

The conclusion is valid. If no fish are mammals and some mammals are not cats, it follows that no fish can be cats.

No fish are mammals. Some mammals are not cats. Therefore, no fish are cats. Is

Practice Questions

Q1
No fish are mammals. Some mammals are not cats. Therefore, no fish are cats. Is this conclusion valid?
  1. Yes
  2. No
  3. Cannot be determined
  4. Only if more information is provided

Questions & Step-by-Step Solutions

No fish are mammals. Some mammals are not cats. Therefore, no fish are cats. Is this conclusion valid?
  • Logical Deduction – The ability to draw conclusions based on given premises.
  • Syllogism – A form of reasoning in which a conclusion is drawn from two given or assumed propositions (premises).
  • Categorical Logic – The study of how different categories relate to one another.
Soulshift Feedback ×

On a scale of 0–10, how likely are you to recommend The Soulshift Academy?

Not likely Very likely
Home Practice Performance eBooks