My Learning Cart
?
Categories
Account

No fish can fly. Some birds can fly. Therefore, no birds are fish. Is this concl

₹0.0
Login to Download
  • 📥 Instant PDF Download
  • ♾ Lifetime Access
  • 🛡 Secure & Original Content

What’s inside this PDF?

Question: No fish can fly. Some birds can fly. Therefore, no birds are fish. Is this conclusion valid?

Options:

  1. Yes
  2. No
  3. Only if all flying things are birds
  4. Only if some fish can fly

Correct Answer: Yes

Solution: 

The conclusion is valid because if no fish can fly and some birds can fly, it follows that no birds can be fish.

No fish can fly. Some birds can fly. Therefore, no birds are fish. Is this concl

Practice Questions

Q1
No fish can fly. Some birds can fly. Therefore, no birds are fish. Is this conclusion valid?
  1. Yes
  2. No
  3. Only if all flying things are birds
  4. Only if some fish can fly

Questions & Step-by-Step Solutions

No fish can fly. Some birds can fly. Therefore, no birds are fish. Is this conclusion valid?
  • Logical Reasoning – The question tests the ability to analyze syllogistic reasoning and the validity of conclusions drawn from premises.
  • Categorical Logic – It involves understanding the relationships between different categories (fish and birds) based on given statements.
Soulshift Feedback ×

On a scale of 0–10, how likely are you to recommend The Soulshift Academy?

Not likely Very likely
Home Practice Performance eBooks