My Learning Cart
?
Categories
Account

No fish are mammals. Some mammals are not birds. Which conclusion is valid?

₹0.0
Login to Download
  • 📥 Instant PDF Download
  • ♾ Lifetime Access
  • 🛡 Secure & Original Content

What’s inside this PDF?

Question: No fish are mammals. Some mammals are not birds. Which conclusion is valid?

Options:

  1. All birds are fish.
  2. Some fish are not birds.
  3. Some mammals are fish.
  4. All mammals are birds.

Correct Answer: Some fish are not birds.

Solution: 

Since no fish are mammals and some mammals are not birds, it can be concluded that some fish are not birds.

No fish are mammals. Some mammals are not birds. Which conclusion is valid?

Practice Questions

Q1
No fish are mammals. Some mammals are not birds. Which conclusion is valid?
  1. All birds are fish.
  2. Some fish are not birds.
  3. Some mammals are fish.
  4. All mammals are birds.

Questions & Step-by-Step Solutions

No fish are mammals. Some mammals are not birds. Which conclusion is valid?
  • Logical Deduction – The ability to draw conclusions based on given premises.
  • Categorical Logic – Understanding relationships between different categories (fish, mammals, birds) and how they interact.
Soulshift Feedback ×

On a scale of 0–10, how likely are you to recommend The Soulshift Academy?

Not likely Very likely
Home Practice Performance eBooks