My Learning Cart
?
Categories
Account

No birds are fish. All fish are animals. Therefore, no birds are animals. Is thi

₹0.0
Login to Download
  • 📥 Instant PDF Download
  • ♾ Lifetime Access
  • 🛡 Secure & Original Content

What’s inside this PDF?

Question: No birds are fish. All fish are animals. Therefore, no birds are animals. Is this conclusion valid?

Options:

  1. Yes
  2. No
  3. Only if all animals are birds
  4. Only if some birds are fish

Correct Answer: No

Solution: 

The conclusion is not valid because while no birds are fish, it does not imply that no birds are animals since birds can belong to a different category of animals.

No birds are fish. All fish are animals. Therefore, no birds are animals. Is thi

Practice Questions

Q1
No birds are fish. All fish are animals. Therefore, no birds are animals. Is this conclusion valid?
  1. Yes
  2. No
  3. Only if all animals are birds
  4. Only if some birds are fish

Questions & Step-by-Step Solutions

No birds are fish. All fish are animals. Therefore, no birds are animals. Is this conclusion valid?
  • Logical Reasoning – The question tests the ability to analyze logical relationships and draw valid conclusions based on premises.
  • Categorical Logic – It involves understanding the relationships between different categories (birds, fish, animals) and how they interact.
Soulshift Feedback ×

On a scale of 0–10, how likely are you to recommend The Soulshift Academy?

Not likely Very likely
Home Practice Performance eBooks