All dogs bark. Some animals that bark are not dogs. Therefore, some animals that bark are not dogs. Is this conclusion valid? (2023)
Practice Questions
1 question
Q1
All dogs bark. Some animals that bark are not dogs. Therefore, some animals that bark are not dogs. Is this conclusion valid? (2023)
Yes
No
Only if all barking animals are dogs
Only if some dogs are animals
The conclusion is valid. The premises support the existence of animals that bark but are not dogs.
Questions & Step-by-step Solutions
1 item
Q
Q: All dogs bark. Some animals that bark are not dogs. Therefore, some animals that bark are not dogs. Is this conclusion valid? (2023)
Solution: The conclusion is valid. The premises support the existence of animals that bark but are not dogs.
Steps: 5
Step 1: Understand the first statement: 'All dogs bark.' This means every dog makes a barking sound.
Step 2: Understand the second statement: 'Some animals that bark are not dogs.' This means there are some animals that make a barking sound but are not dogs.
Step 3: Analyze the conclusion: 'Therefore, some animals that bark are not dogs.' This is a restatement of the second statement.
Step 4: Check if the premises support the conclusion: Since the second statement directly states that some barking animals are not dogs, it supports the conclusion.
Step 5: Conclude that the conclusion is valid because it logically follows from the premises.
