What is a common method for feature importance evaluation in Random Forests?

Practice Questions

Q1
What is a common method for feature importance evaluation in Random Forests?
  1. Permutation importance
  2. Gradient boosting
  3. K-fold cross-validation
  4. Principal component analysis

Questions & Step-by-Step Solutions

What is a common method for feature importance evaluation in Random Forests?
  • Step 1: Train a Random Forest model using your dataset with all features.
  • Step 2: Measure the model's accuracy or prediction error on a validation set. This is your baseline performance.
  • Step 3: Choose one feature that you want to evaluate for importance.
  • Step 4: Randomly shuffle the values of that chosen feature in the validation set. This means you mix up the values so they no longer correspond to the original data.
  • Step 5: Use the Random Forest model to make predictions again using the modified validation set (with the shuffled feature).
  • Step 6: Measure the new accuracy or prediction error of the model with the shuffled feature.
  • Step 7: Compare the new prediction error with the baseline performance from Step 2.
  • Step 8: The difference in prediction error indicates the importance of the feature: a larger increase in error means the feature is more important.
No concepts available.
Soulshift Feedback ×

On a scale of 0–10, how likely are you to recommend The Soulshift Academy?

Not likely Very likely