My Learning
Cart
Sign In
Categories
School
Biology (School & UG)
Chemistry (School & UG)
English (School)
Mathematics (School)
Physics (School & Undergraduate)
Show All School
College
Commerce & Accountancy
Languages & Literature
Law & Legal Studies
Medical Science
Technical
Show All College
Degree
Civil Engineering
Computer Science & IT
Electrical & Electronics Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Show All Degree
Competitve
Current Affairs & GK
General Aptitude
General Knowledge
General Knowledge & Current Affairs
Major Competitive Exams
Show All Competitve
Skills
Data Structures & Algorithms
Vocational & Skill Development
Show All Skills
Under the Sum-of-the-Years'-Digits Method, how is the depreciation expense calcu
Practice Questions
Q1
Under the Sum-of-the-Years'-Digits Method, how is the depreciation expense calculated?
(Cost - Salvage Value) x (Remaining Life / Sum of Years)
(Cost - Salvage Value) / Useful Life
Cost x Depreciation Rate
Cost / (Useful Life x 2)
Questions & Step-by-Step Solutions
Under the Sum-of-the-Years'-Digits Method, how is the depreciation expense calculated?
Steps
Concepts
Step 1: Identify the cost of the asset. This is the amount you paid to acquire it.
Step 2: Determine the salvage value. This is the estimated value of the asset at the end of its useful life.
Step 3: Calculate the total useful life of the asset in years.
Step 4: Calculate the sum of the years. For example, if the asset has a useful life of 5 years, the sum of the years is 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 = 15.
Step 5: Determine the remaining life of the asset. This is how many years are left until the asset is fully depreciated.
Step 6: Use the formula: Depreciation Expense = (Cost - Salvage Value) x (Remaining Life / Sum of Years).
Step 7: Plug in the values you have into the formula to calculate the depreciation expense for the current year.
No concepts available.
‹
School
College
Degree
Competitve
Skills
›
Soulshift Feedback
×
On a scale of 0–10, how likely are you to recommend
The Soulshift Academy
?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Not likely
Very likely
✕
↑