Using the grating equation d sin θ = nλ, where d = 1/500000 m, n = 1, and λ = 600 x 10^-9 m, we find θ ≈ 30 degrees.

If the slit width is halved, the width of the central maximum increases because the angle for the first minimum increases.

The angular position of the first minimum is given by sin θ = λ/a.

The intensity of the central maximum is greater than that of the other maxima in a diffraction pattern.

Using the grating equation d sin(θ) = mλ, where d = 1/1000 mm = 1 x 10^-6 m, for m=1, we find θ ≈ 30 degrees.

Increasing the distance between the slits decreases the fringe width, as fringe width is inversely proportional to the slit separation.

When the slit width is equal to the wavelength, a wide central maximum is observed due to significant diffraction.

If the slit width is halved, the width of the central maximum doubles, as it is inversely proportional to the slit width.

Halving the wavelength results in the first minimum moving closer to the center, as the position of minima is directly related to the wavelength.

Halving the wavelength causes the minima to move closer together, as the angle for minima is directly proportional to the wavelength.

Halving the wavelength will halve the angle for the first minimum, as the position of minima is directly proportional to the wavelength.

Increasing the wavelength results in a broader diffraction pattern as the angles for minima and maxima increase.

Increasing the number of slits in a diffraction grating increases the sharpness of the maxima due to constructive interference.

The angle of diffraction is directly proportional to the order of the maximum in a diffraction grating.

In a diffraction pattern, the minima are always darker than the maxima, which have higher intensity.

Using the condition for the first minimum a sin(30°) = λ, we find the ratio a/λ = 1/√3.

The intensity of the central maximum is theoretically infinite compared to the first minimum, which has zero intensity.

The intensity of the central maximum in a diffraction pattern depends on both the wavelength of light and the slit width.

Fringe separation refers to the distance between two consecutive maxima in a diffraction pattern.

The order of diffraction refers to the number of maxima observed in the diffraction pattern, with the central maximum being the zeroth order.

The intensity of the central maximum is typically much greater than that of the first minimum, often approximated as 1:4.

The fringe separation is inversely proportional to the distance between the slits; thus, if the distance is doubled, the fringe separation halves.

The fringe separation is inversely proportional to the distance between the slits; halving the distance doubles the fringe separation.

The distance between the fringes increases with an increase in wavelength, as fringe separation is directly proportional to wavelength.

Increasing the distance between the slits increases the fringe width because the angle of diffraction increases.

As the slit width decreases, the central maximum becomes wider due to increased diffraction.

The intensity of the central maximum is four times that of the first minimum in a single-slit diffraction pattern.

The intensity at the first minimum is zero, while the central maximum has maximum intensity.

The width of the central maximum is inversely proportional to the slit width. Halving the slit width doubles the width of the central maximum to 8 mm.

Increasing the distance between the slits increases the fringe width because the angle of diffraction increases.