In Minerva Mills v. Union of India, the Supreme Court ruled that the power of judicial review is a basic feature of the Constitution.

The term 'basic structure' refers to the essential features of the Constitution that cannot be amended or altered by any legislative action.

Judicial review allows the judiciary to ensure that laws passed by the legislature are in compliance with the Constitution.

The case S.R. Bommai v. Union of India limited the power of the President to dismiss state governments and reinforced the role of judicial review in maintaining constitutional governance.

Article 13 of the Indian Constitution provides for the power of judicial review by declaring that any law inconsistent with fundamental rights shall be void.

Minerva Mills v. Union of India reaffirmed the basic structure doctrine and emphasized the importance of fundamental rights.

The Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala case established the basic structure doctrine, which holds that certain fundamental features of the Constitution cannot be altered or destroyed.

All of the options listed are types of writs that can be issued by the Supreme Court or High Courts for the enforcement of fundamental rights.

Parliamentary sovereignty is not considered part of the basic structure of the Constitution; rather, the basic structure emphasizes the supremacy of the Constitution itself.