Increasing the number of slits in a diffraction grating increases the sharpness of the maxima due to constructive interference.

Increasing the number of slits increases the sharpness of the maxima, thus decreasing the angular width.

The angle of diffraction is directly proportional to the order of the maximum in a diffraction grating.

In a diffraction pattern, the minima are always darker than the maxima, which have higher intensity.

Using the condition for the first minimum a sin(30°) = λ, we find the ratio a/λ = 1/√3.

The intensity of the central maximum is theoretically infinite compared to the first minimum, which has zero intensity.

The intensity of the central maximum in a diffraction pattern depends on both the wavelength of light and the slit width.

Fringe separation refers to the distance between two consecutive maxima in a diffraction pattern.

The order of diffraction refers to the number of maxima observed in the diffraction pattern, with the central maximum being the zeroth order.

Increasing the slit width results in a wider central maximum due to the decrease in diffraction effects.

The intensity of the central maximum is typically much greater than that of the first minimum, often approximated as 1:4.

Bit rate refers to the number of bits transmitted per second in a digital communication system.

The depletion region in a diode is the area where no charge carriers are present.

The depletion region is the area in a diode where no current flows under reverse bias.

Using the lens maker's formula, f = (R1 * R2) / (n - 1) * (1/R1 - 1/R2), we find f = 12 cm.

Fringe separation is directly proportional to the distance from the slits to the screen; increasing this distance increases fringe separation.

Fringe width β = λD/d = (600 x 10^-9 m)(1 m)/(0.2 x 10^-3 m) = 0.003 m = 0.6 mm.

Using the formula for fringe separation, y = (λD)/d, we find y = (500 x 10^-9 m * 2 m) / (0.5 x 10^-3 m) = 2 cm.

Distance between fringes = β = λD/d. For first and second bright fringes, the distance is 2β.

Fringe width (β) is given by β = λD/d, where d is the distance between the slits. If d is doubled, β is halved.

Fringe width (β) is inversely proportional to the distance between the slits (d). If d is doubled, β is halved.

The fringe separation is inversely proportional to the distance between the slits; thus, if the distance is doubled, the fringe separation halves.

Fringe width (β) is given by β = λD/d, where d is the distance between the slits. If d is doubled, β becomes β/2, hence the fringe width halves.

The fringe separation is inversely proportional to the distance between the slits; halving the distance doubles the fringe separation.

Increasing the distance between the slits decreases the fringe width, which can lead to more visible fringes within a given distance on the screen.

Increasing the distance between the slits (d) causes the fringe width (β) to decrease, making the fringes narrower.

Increasing the distance to the screen increases the fringe width, as fringe width is proportional to the distance from the slits.

Fringe separation is directly proportional to the distance from the slits to the screen (D), so increasing D increases the fringe separation.

Increasing the distance to the screen increases the fringe width, as fringe width is proportional to the distance from the slits.

At the first minimum, the intensity is 0 due to destructive interference.