Article I of the U.S. Constitution deals with the legislative branch.

Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution provides for the right to freedom of speech and expression.

The Minerva Mills case addressed the issue of the basic structure in the context of the 42nd Amendment, asserting that amendments cannot alter the basic structure.

Mapp v. Ohio established the exclusionary rule, which prevents illegally obtained evidence from being used in court.

The Supreme Court in K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India recognized the right to privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution.

The case of Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala is known for establishing the 'basic structure' doctrine, which limits Parliament's power to amend the Constitution.

Minerva Mills v. Union of India reaffirmed the basic structure doctrine and emphasized the importance of fundamental rights.

Article 356 allows for the imposition of President's Rule in a State when the governance in the State cannot be carried on in accordance with the Constitution.

The Writ of Mandamus is primarily used to enforce fundamental rights against state actions, compelling the state to perform its duty.

Article 46 specifically aims to promote the educational and economic interests of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.

Article 43 aims to secure a living wage and decent conditions of work for workers.

Article 19 of the Indian Constitution provides for the right to freedom of speech and expression, among other freedoms.

Article 21 protects the right to life and personal liberty, ensuring that no person shall be deprived of their life or personal liberty except according to the procedure established by law.

In Minerva Mills v. Union of India, the Supreme Court emphasized the harmony and balance between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles.

In Minerva Mills v. Union of India, the Supreme Court emphasized the need for harmony between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles.

The Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala case established the basic structure doctrine, which holds that certain fundamental features of the Constitution cannot be altered or destroyed.

The case of State of West Bengal v. Union of India established the principle of federal supremacy in the context of legislative powers.

The Supreme Court in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India recognized the right to privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21.

In Minerva Mills v. Union of India, the Supreme Court emphasized the harmony and balance between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy.

In Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka, the Supreme Court held that the right to education is a fundamental right under Article 21.

Article 46 of the Constitution directs the state to promote the educational and economic interests of Scheduled Castes.

Article 46 directs the state to promote the educational and economic interests of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.

Article 45 directs the state to provide for early childhood care and education to children until they complete the age of six years.

Article 41 of the Constitution provides for the right to work, to education, and to public assistance.

Article 46 mandates the State to promote educational and economic interests of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.

Article 39(a) directs the state to secure the right to an adequate means of livelihood for all citizens.

All of the options listed are types of writs that can be issued by the Supreme Court or High Courts for the enforcement of fundamental rights.

The Writ of Mandamus can be used to enforce the implementation of Directive Principles.

Article 51 of the Constitution promotes international peace and security as a Directive Principle.

The Directive Principles of State Policy are fundamental in governance and guide the state in making laws and policies.