Logical Reasoning for Competitive Exam Success

My Learning Cart

Logical Reasoning

Download Q&A

Logical Reasoning MCQ & Objective Questions

Logical reasoning is a crucial skill that plays a significant role in various exams. Mastering logical reasoning can enhance your problem-solving abilities and boost your confidence during tests. Practicing MCQs and objective questions in this area not only helps in understanding concepts but also prepares you to tackle important questions effectively, leading to better scores in your exams.

What You Will Practise Here

Analytical reasoning techniques
Logical sequences and patterns
Deductive and inductive reasoning
Critical thinking and argument analysis
Data interpretation and logical puzzles
Venn diagrams and their applications
Common logical fallacies and how to avoid them

Exam Relevance

Logical reasoning is a vital component in various examinations, including CBSE, State Boards, NEET, and JEE. In these exams, you can expect questions that assess your ability to analyze information, draw conclusions, and solve problems logically. Common question patterns include identifying logical relationships, solving puzzles, and interpreting data, making it essential to practice logical reasoning MCQ questions to excel.

Common Mistakes Students Make

Overlooking key details in the questions
Confusing similar logical patterns
Rushing through problems without careful analysis
Neglecting to practice with a variety of question types

FAQs

Question: What are some effective strategies for solving logical reasoning MCQs?
Answer: Break down the question, identify keywords, and eliminate clearly wrong options to improve your chances of selecting the correct answer.

Question: How can I improve my logical reasoning skills?
Answer: Regular practice with logical reasoning objective questions and reviewing explanations for both correct and incorrect answers can significantly enhance your skills.

Start your journey towards mastering logical reasoning today! Solve practice MCQs to test your understanding and boost your exam preparation. Remember, consistent practice is the key to success!

Analogies Analyzing Arguments Artificial Language Cause and Effect Course of Action Essential Part Letter and Symbol Series Logical Deduction Logical Games Logical Problems Making Judgments Matching Definitions Number Series Statement and Argument Statement and Assumption Statement and Conclusion Theme Detection Verbal Classification Verbal Reasoning

Q. No birds are mammals. Some mammals are not dogs. Therefore, no birds are dogs. Is this conclusion valid?

A. Yes
B. No
C. Cannot be determined
D. Only if all mammals are birds

Solution

The conclusion is not valid because the relationship between birds and dogs is not established through the given statements.

Correct Answer: B — No

Q. No birds are mammals. Some mammals are not reptiles. Therefore, no birds are reptiles. Is this conclusion valid?

A. Yes
B. No
C. Cannot be determined
D. Only if more information is provided

Solution

The conclusion is not valid. The premises do not provide enough information to conclude that no birds are reptiles.

Correct Answer: B — No

Q. No birds are mammals. Some mammals are not reptiles. Which conclusion is valid?

A. Some birds are reptiles.
B. All mammals are birds.
C. Some reptiles are not mammals.
D. All reptiles are birds.

Solution

Since no birds are mammals and some mammals are not reptiles, it can be concluded that some reptiles are not mammals.

Correct Answer: C — Some reptiles are not mammals.

Q. No birds are mammals. Some mammals are not reptiles. Which of the following conclusions can be drawn?

A. All birds are reptiles.
B. Some birds are not mammals.
C. All mammals are birds.
D. Some reptiles are not mammals.

Solution

Since no birds are mammals, it can be concluded that some birds are not mammals.

Correct Answer: B — Some birds are not mammals.

Q. No cars are bicycles. Some bicycles are not motorcycles. Which conclusion is valid?

A. All motorcycles are cars.
B. Some cars are not motorcycles.
C. Some bicycles are cars.
D. Some motorcycles are not bicycles.

Solution

Since no cars are bicycles and some bicycles are not motorcycles, it can be concluded that some motorcycles are not bicycles.

Correct Answer: D — Some motorcycles are not bicycles.

Q. No cars are bicycles. Some bicycles are not motorcycles. Which of the following conclusions can be drawn?

A. All motorcycles are cars.
B. Some cars are not motorcycles.
C. Some bicycles are cars.
D. Some motorcycles are not bicycles.

Solution

Since no cars are bicycles and some bicycles are not motorcycles, it can be concluded that some motorcycles are not bicycles.

Correct Answer: D — Some motorcycles are not bicycles.

Q. No fish are mammals. Some mammals are not birds. Therefore, no fish are birds. Is this conclusion valid?

A. Yes
B. No
C. Only if all mammals are fish
D. Only if some fish are mammals

Solution

The conclusion is not valid. The premises do not support the conclusion that no fish are birds.

Correct Answer: B — No

Q. No fish are mammals. Some mammals are not birds. Which conclusion is valid?

A. All birds are fish.
B. Some fish are not birds.
C. Some mammals are fish.
D. All mammals are birds.

Solution

Since no fish are mammals and some mammals are not birds, it can be concluded that some fish are not birds.

Correct Answer: B — Some fish are not birds.

Q. No fish are mammals. Some mammals are not cats. Therefore, no fish are cats. Is this conclusion valid?

A. Yes
B. No
C. Cannot be determined
D. Only if more information is provided

Solution

The conclusion is valid. If no fish are mammals and some mammals are not cats, it follows that no fish can be cats.

Correct Answer: A — Yes

Q. No fish are mammals. Some mammals are not whales. Therefore, no fish are whales. Is this conclusion valid?

A. Yes
B. No
C. Only if all mammals are fish
D. Only if some fish are mammals

Solution

The conclusion is not valid. The premises do not provide enough information to conclude anything about the relationship between fish and whales.

Correct Answer: B — No

Q. No reptiles are mammals. All snakes are reptiles. Therefore, no snakes are mammals. Is this conclusion valid?

A. Yes
B. No
C. Only if all reptiles are snakes
D. Only if some mammals are reptiles

Solution

The conclusion is valid because if no reptiles are mammals and all snakes are reptiles, then it follows that no snakes can be mammals.

Correct Answer: A — Yes

Q. No reptiles are mammals. Some mammals are not cats. Therefore, no reptiles are cats. Is this conclusion valid?

A. Yes
B. No
C. Cannot be determined
D. Only if all mammals are reptiles

Solution

The conclusion is not valid because the relationship between reptiles and cats is not established through the given statements.

Correct Answer: B — No

Q. No reptiles are mammals. Some mammals are not cats. Therefore, some reptiles are not cats. Is this conclusion valid?

A. Yes
B. No
C. Only if all mammals are reptiles
D. Only if some reptiles are mammals

Solution

The conclusion is not valid because the premises do not provide a direct relationship between reptiles and cats.

Correct Answer: B — No

Q. No students are dropouts. Some dropouts are not employed. Which of the following conclusions can be drawn?

A. All employed people are students.
B. Some students are not employed.
C. Some dropouts are students.
D. Some employed people are not dropouts.

Solution

Since no students are dropouts and some dropouts are not employed, it can be concluded that some employed people are not dropouts.

Correct Answer: D — Some employed people are not dropouts.

Q. No students are teachers. Some teachers are not professors. Which of the following conclusions can be drawn?

A. Some students are professors.
B. All teachers are students.
C. Some professors are not students.
D. All professors are teachers.

Solution

Since no students are teachers and some teachers are not professors, it can be concluded that some professors are not students.

Correct Answer: C — Some professors are not students.

Q. Pencil is to Write as Brush is to ?

A. Paint
B. Draw
C. Sketch
D. Color

Solution

A pencil is used to write, while a brush is used to paint.

Correct Answer: A — Paint

Q. Pencil is to Write as Eraser is to?

A. Draw
B. Erase
C. Color
D. Sketch

Solution

A pencil is used to write, just as an eraser is used to erase.

Correct Answer: B — Erase

Q. Select the word that is not related: Doctor, Nurse, Hospital, Car.

A. Doctor
B. Nurse
C. Hospital
D. Car

Solution

Car is not related to the medical profession.

Correct Answer: D — Car

Q. Some birds can fly. All flying creatures are animals. Therefore, some birds are animals. Is this conclusion valid?

A. Yes
B. No
C. Only if more information is provided
D. Cannot be determined

Solution

The conclusion is valid because if some birds can fly and all flying creatures are animals, then those birds must be animals.

Correct Answer: A — Yes

Q. Some cars are electric. All electric cars are expensive. Therefore, some cars are expensive. Is this conclusion valid?

A. Yes
B. No
C. Only if all cars are electric
D. Only if some cars are not electric

Solution

The conclusion is valid because if some cars are electric and all electric cars are expensive, then those cars that are electric must also be expensive.

Correct Answer: A — Yes

Q. Some dogs are friendly. All friendly animals are pets. Therefore, some dogs are pets. Is this conclusion valid?

A. Yes
B. No
C. Only if all pets are dogs
D. Only if some pets are dogs

Solution

The conclusion is not valid because while some dogs are friendly, it does not guarantee that those friendly dogs are pets.

Correct Answer: B — No

Q. Some fruits are sweet. All sweet things are tasty. Which conclusion is correct?

A. All fruits are tasty.
B. Some tasty things are fruits.
C. Some sweet things are not fruits.
D. All tasty things are fruits.

Solution

Since some fruits are sweet and all sweet things are tasty, it follows that some tasty things are fruits.

Correct Answer: B — Some tasty things are fruits.

Q. Some fruits are sweet. All sweet things are tasty. Which of the following conclusions can be drawn?

A. All fruits are tasty.
B. Some tasty things are fruits.
C. Some sweet things are not fruits.
D. All tasty things are sweet.

Solution

Since some fruits are sweet and all sweet things are tasty, it follows that some tasty things are fruits.

Correct Answer: B — Some tasty things are fruits.

Q. Some metals are conductive. All conductive materials are useful. Which of the following conclusions can be drawn?

A. All useful materials are metals.
B. Some useful materials are not metals.
C. Some metals are not useful.
D. All conductive materials are metals.

Solution

Since some metals are conductive and all conductive materials are useful, it can be concluded that some useful materials are not metals.

Correct Answer: B — Some useful materials are not metals.

Q. Some teachers are not professors. All professors are educated. Which conclusion is correct?

A. All teachers are educated.
B. Some educated people are not teachers.
C. Some professors are not teachers.
D. All educated people are teachers.

Solution

Since some teachers are not professors and all professors are educated, it can be concluded that all teachers are educated.

Correct Answer: A — All teachers are educated.

Q. Some teachers are not professors. All professors are educated. Which of the following conclusions can be drawn?

A. All teachers are educated.
B. Some educated people are not teachers.
C. Some professors are not teachers.
D. All educated people are professors.

Solution

Since all professors are educated, it can be concluded that all teachers are educated.

Correct Answer: A — All teachers are educated.

Q. Some teachers are not strict. All strict people are disciplined. Therefore, some teachers are not disciplined. Is this conclusion valid?

A. Yes
B. No
C. Only if all teachers are strict
D. Only if some strict people are not teachers

Solution

The conclusion is valid because if some teachers are not strict and all strict people are disciplined, then those teachers who are not strict may also not be disciplined.

Correct Answer: A — Yes

Q. Some teachers are strict. All strict people are disciplined. Which of the following conclusions can be drawn?

A. All teachers are disciplined.
B. Some disciplined people are teachers.
C. Some strict people are not teachers.
D. All disciplined people are teachers.

Solution

Since some teachers are strict and all strict people are disciplined, it follows that some disciplined people are teachers.

Correct Answer: B — Some disciplined people are teachers.

Q. Statement: A balanced diet is crucial for health. Assumption: Health is the most important aspect of life.

A. True
B. False
C. Cannot be determined
D. None of the above

Solution

The assumption is subjective and does not necessarily follow from the statement.

Correct Answer: B — False

Q. Statement: All birds can fly. Argument: Therefore, penguins can fly.

A. Argument is strong.
B. Argument is weak.
C. Argument is irrelevant.
D. Argument is valid.

Solution

The argument is weak because it incorrectly includes penguins, which cannot fly.

Correct Answer: B — Argument is weak.

Showing 391 to 420 of 684 (23 Pages)

School

College

Degree

Competitve

Skills

Soulshift Feedback ×

On a scale of 0–10, how likely are you to recommend The Soulshift Academy?

Not likely Very likely